February 22, 2012

Poll Says: “I Want My TZB…” with Mass Transit

Political Alert: Bridge Crosses Potential Voters, Too

by Dave Zornow

Nyack, Jan 2 — More than eight out of ten people living in the Nyack River Villages want a new Tappan Zee Bridge to include some form of mass transit, according to a survey conducted between Dec 22 and 28.

The vast majority of respondents — 84 percent — agreed with the statement “The new Tappan Zee Bridge should include some form of mass transit when it is built.” Six percent supported Governor Andrew Cuomo’s plan to build the bridge first and add transit sometime in the future. Five percent say we don’t need a new bridge.

Which statement best describes your opinion
about building a new Tappan Zee Bridge?
We don’t need a new bridge. 5%
I am in favor of Governor Cuomo’s plan to build the bridge without mass transit. If trains or buses are needed, we can add them in the future. 6%
The new Tappan Zee Bridge should include some form of mass transit when it is built. 84%
I don’t know enough about this to express an opinion. 5%

Politicians who ignore the bridge issue do so at their own peril.  A strong majority (74%) say that what elected leaders say today will effect how they vote in future elections.

 Will the position taken by elected officials on a new Tappan Zee Bridge affect your vote in the next election?
Total Mass Transit
Supporters
Yes 74%  77%
No 12%  11%
No opinion 14%  11%

 

On December 15, 2011, a coalition of 11 Democratic and Republican politicians and 16 other pro-union, pro-environment, pro-business groups announced their opposition to Governor Andrew Cuomo’s plan to build a new Tappan Zee Bridge without mass transit. The only local official to publicly support the governor’s position without reservation is Assemblywoman Ellen Jaffee (D- Suffern). “After years of planning and deliberation, I am not prepared to delay construction on a replacement bridge by demanding the perfect at the expense of the possible,” said Jaffee.  “I will continue to advocate for BRT as planning and construction proceed, in addition to always being able to add BRT after the project is completed,” she said.

These results are based on the responses of 220 online questionnaires completed by NyackNewsAndViews readers during December 22-28, 2011. Seventy-three percent of the respondents indicated they were from Nyack or the adjacent river villages with another 18 percent from elsewhere in Rockland County. Although these results are not necessarily representative of the broader population, they are consistent with other online polls conducted over the last several months on this issue.

See also: Mass Transit Coalition:  An unHappy Tappan Zee Bridge BDay, 12/16/2011

Comments

  1. rickaccountant says:

    Andrea Stewart-Cousins is all over the TV stating she was instrumental in getting funding for the ‘new’ TZB. I would be embarrassed to have my name associated with this horrendous project as it currently stands. We needamass transit component, not just another outdated bridge which will be obsolete even before it is completed.

  2. Jenni says:

    Is this a done deal? I thought I read that the option for transit was dead entirely. How sad, such a great opportunity wasted if it is.

    Jenni: It’s not a final decision — but the governor, who is taking the lead on this, isn’t having any part of the mass transit movement. I have a theory that it’s because he won’t be able to create a public-private partnership that investors would embrace because mass transit never makes any money.

    However, virtually every local elected leader in the Lower Hudson Valley signed on to a press release last month saying they wanted mass transit on a new Tappan Zee Bridge.

    None of it is final until they have figured out the financing and completed the environmental impact statement — among other milestones. Stay tuned? Or better yet, write your US Senators and Congressmen and tell them what you think! -dz

  3. crobins says:

    what about an option in your polling for a rehabilitated bridge with a BRT lane? This makes sense economically and with the least impact to the Hudson.. and will also create jobs. As a bigger bridge is built the highways and systems feeding into the bridge will have to expand which will contribute to more suburban sprawl and pollution. As is the case now, traffic congestion usually is happening on highways on both sides of the bridge rather than on the bridge itself..

Speak Your Mind